RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
SHARMISTHA SANYAL – Appellant
Versus
SUJIT SEN – Respondent
IA No.2848/2018 (of D-1 u/O VII R-11 CPC)
1. The plaintiffs have filed the present suit pleading:
(i) that the land underneath property No.J-1975, Chitranjan Park, New Delhi was earlier granted on leasehold basis and was subsequently on 1st March, 2000 converted into freehold;
(ii) that in the year 2002, defendant No.1 Sujit Sen and his brother Subir Sen executed a registered Partition Deed dated 15th April, 2002 partitioning the property aforesaid into two equal halves, with the front part going to Subir Sen and the rear half falling to the share of the defendant No.1 Sujit Sen;
(iii) that the said Subir Sen had died, leaving defendants No.2&3 Arghya Sen and Aparajita Sen as his heirs;
(iv) that partition of the plot of land underneath the property aforesaid into two halves, was void ab initio, being contrary to the Master Plan of Delhi and the Building Bye-Laws and other regulations, and thus Subir Sen and the defendant No.1 remained owners in equal share of the entire property;
(v) that the defendant No.1, vide Sale Deed dated 7th May, 2014, sold the first floor of the rear half of the property to the two plaintiffs;
(vi) that the defendant No.1, preceding the sale, explained
Central Bank of India Vs. Workmen AIR 1960 SC 12
Chiranji Lal Vs. Bhagwan Das AIR 1991 Del 325
Federation of Indian Mineral Industries (FIMI) Vs. Union of India 2015 (147) DRJ 137
Mohinder Singh Vs. Kartar Lal 1997 (41) DRJ 264
Prem Singh Vs. Birbal (2006) 5 SCC 353
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.