SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Del) 1448

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
J.R. MIDHA, J.
Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation - Appellant
Versus
Mahipal Singh & Anr. - Respondents
MAC.APP. 182 of 2018 & CM APPL. 6275 of 2018, MAC.APP. 415 of 2018
Decided On : 06-07-2018

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Ratneswar Das, Ms. B. Deha Das
For the Respondents: Mr. Chaman Sharma, Mr. Manoj Kumar, Mr. Pankaj Gupta

The court applied the principles established in National Insurance Co. Limited vs. Pranay Sethi and Ors. to determine the computation of compensation, setting aside the award for loss of love and affection and adjusting the multiplier and future prospects.

Headnote:

Compensation - Dependency - Loss of Love and Affection - Future Prospects - Negligence - [COMPENSATION] - [DEPENDENCY] - The court considered the computation of compensation in a case involving the death of a young individual and addressed the issues of dependency, loss of love and affection, future prospects, and negligence. The court applied the principles laid down in National Insurance Co. Limited vs. Pranay Sethi and Ors. to determine the compensation, setting aside the award for loss of love and affection and adjusting the multiplier and future prospects. The court also affirmed the finding of negligence by the Claims Tribunal, influencing the final decision to enhance the compensation amount.

Fact of the Case:

The deceased, aged 19, died in an accident, and the Claims Tribunal awarded compensation to the claimants. The appellant challenged the award, disputing negligence and the computation of compensation.

Finding of the Court:

The court affirmed the finding of negligence by the Claims Tribunal and adjusted the computation of compensation, enhancing the amount awarded to the claimants. The appellant's challenge was dismissed, and directions were given for the deposit and disbursement of the enhanced award amount.

Issues: Dispute over negligence and computation of compensation.

Ratio Decidendi: The court upheld the finding of negligence and adjusted the computation of compensation based on the principles established in National Insurance Co. Limited vs. Pranay Sethi and Ors.

Final Decision: MAC.APP.415/2018 was allowed, enhancing the compensation amount, while MAC.APP.182/2018 was dismissed. Directions were given for the deposit and disbursement of the enhanced award amount.

JUDGMENT :

1. The parties have challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.11,86,936/- has been awarded to the claimants.

2. The accident dated 13th November, 2015 resulted in the death of Omkar Pal @ Rohit. The deceased was aged 19 years at the time of accident and was survived by his parents who claimed compensation. The deceased was doing graduation. It was claimed that deceased was also giving tuitions and was earning Rs.15,000/- per month. In the absence of any proof of income, the Claims Tribunal took the minimum wages of 11,154/- per month, deducted 1/2 towards personal expenses and applied multiplier of 14 according to the age of the mother of the deceased to compute the loss of dependency as Rs.9,36,936/-. The Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.1,50,000/- towards loss of love and affection, Rs.50,000/- towards funeral expenses and Rs.50,000/- towards loss of estate. The total compensation of Rs.11,86,936/- has been awarded.

3. Learned counsel for appellant in MAC.182/2018 urged at the time of hearing that the deceased was hit by a tempo moving ahead the motorcycle being driven by the deceased and there was no negligence on the part of the driver of the bus. It is further submitted that the compensation for loss of love and affection is no more a permissible head in view of the National Insurance Co. Limited vs. Pranay Sethi and Ors., 2017 SCC Online SC 1270.

4. Learned counsel for the claimants urged at the time of hearing that future prospects of 40% be awarded and the multiplier be enhanced from 14 to 18 in terms of the principles laid down in National Insurance Co. Limited vs. Pranay Sethi and Ors. (supra).

5. With respect to the negligence, the Claims Tribunal has believed the statement of the eye witness, Vishal who appeared in the witness box as PW-2. The Claims Tribunal also noted that the driver of the bus has been prosecuted under Section 279/338/304-A IPC. The Claims Tribunal did not believe the statement of the bus driver. The relevant discussion is recorded in para-8.1 of the award. This Court does not find any infirmity in the finding of negligence of the bus driver by the Claims Tribunal.

6. With respect to the computation of compensation, the claimants are entitled to future prospects at the rate of 40% and the multiplier of 18 has to be applied according to the age of the deceased. The loss of love and affection is no more a permissible head and therefore, the compensation of Rs.1,50,000/- awarded towards loss of love and affection is set aside. The compensation towards funeral expenses and loss of estate is reduced to Rs.15,000/- each.

7. Taking the income of the deceased as Rs.11,154/-, adding 40% towards future prospects, deducting 50% towards personal expenses and applying the multiplier of 18, the loss of dependency is computed as Rs.16,86,484.80. Rs. 15,000/- each is awarded towards loss of estate and funeral expenses. The claimants are entitled to total compensation of Rs.17,16,484.80 rounded off to Rs.17,16,500/-.

8. MAC.APP.415/2018 is allowed and the compensation amount is enhanced from Rs.11,86,963/- to Rs.17,16,500/- along with interest @ 9% per annum from the date of institution of the claim petition i.e. 23rd January, 2016. MAC.APP.182/2018 is dismissed.

9. The appellant in MAC.APP.182/2018 is directed to deposit enhanced award amount with the Registrar General of this Court within four weeks.

10. With respect to Rs.12,70,370/- deposited by the appellant in MAC.APP.182/2018, the Registrar General is directed to disburse the same to the claimants by instructing UCO Bank, Delhi High Court Branch as under:-

(i) Rs.10,20,000/- be kept in 120 FDRs of Rs.8,500/- each, for the period 1 month to 120 months respectively, in the name of appellant No.2 with cumulative interest.

(ii) The balance amount after keeping Rs.10,20,000/- in FDRs, be released to the claimants, Mahipal Singh and Puran Wati in equal shares by transferring the same to their following savings bank accounts.

a. Respondent n










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top