G.S. Sistani, J.

CAV. PET.589/2018

1. None was present on behalf of the caveator when the matter was taken at the first call. We had requested the learned counsel for the petitioner to inform the caveator that the matter has been passed over and would be taken up for hearing today. We are informed that an attempt was made to call the learned counsel for the respondent no.1. Being unsuccessful, the counsel associate Mr. Nand Kumar had personally met Mr. Manish, clerk of Mr. B.K. Gautam, Advocate in his Chamber no.94. A.K. Sen Block, Supreme Court, New Delhi. The clerk informed the counsel that although Mr. Gautam was aware about the listing of the matter, but he had no instructions to appear. Accordingly, the caveat petition is disposed of.

CMs.APPL 25743-25744/2018(Exemption)

2. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

3. The applications stand disposed of.

L.P.A.349/2018

4. The present appeal is directed against the order dated 23.05.2018 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in the writ petition filed by respondent no.1.

5. Mr. Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that the impugned order was passed without issuing notice to the