SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Del) 1496

PRATHIBA M.SINGH
ASHA ROHILLA – Appellant
Versus
PARAMPREET SINGH – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Respondent:Mr. S.S. Bhatia & Mr. Naveen Arya, Advocates

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J.

1. In this appeal, the Plaintiff/Appellant (hereinafter ‘Plaintiff’) challenges the judgment/decree dated 9th September, 2016 by which the suit for specific performance filed by her was dismissed and a decree of refund of the earnest money paid has been granted in the following terms :

“35. Admittedly, defendants have received a sum of Rs.8 Lacs from the plaintiff. Admittedly, sum of Rs.5 lacs was received by defendants on 01.01.2005. Further, a sum of Rs.3 lacs was received by defendants from the plaintiff on 07.09.2005.

36. As noted in decision on issue no.4, it has been submitted by defendants in written submissions that defendants are willing to refund the said advance/earnest money to plaintiff, on such terms as the Court may deem proper. In view of this stand of defendants, they are directed to refund the sum of Rs. 8 lacs to the plaintiff.

Plaintiff is entitled to interest @ 18% per annum on the amount of Rs.8 lacs i.e. w.e.f. 01.01.2005 on Rs. 5 lacs and w.e.f. 07.09.2005 on Rs.3 lacs, till realization.”

2. The case in brief of the Plaintiff is that she entered into an Agreement to Sell dated 1st January, 2005 in respect of property bearing no.226,





















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top