SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Del) 3263

G.P.MITTAL
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Kavita Singal – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Manjusha Wadhwa
For the Respondents: R.M. Bagai

JUDGMENT :

G.P. Mittal, J.

The Appellant Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. impugns the award dated 20.08.2009 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal whereby a compensation of Rs. 1,00,000/- as personal accident insurance cover was awarded in favour of the Respondents No.1 to 3 who are the legal heirs of deceased Vikas Singhal. He died in an accident, which took place on 19.11.2006. The finding that the accident was caused on account of deceased's own negligence is not disputed as the Respondents No.1 to 3 have not filed any appeal or cross-objection against the judgment. The Tribunal relying on the judgment of the Supreme Court in Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Rajni Devi and Others, (2008) 5 SCC 736 and Ningamma and Another Vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd., (2009) 13 SCC 710, held that the deceased stepped into the shoes of the owner i.e. Respondent No.4 Vineet Singhal and was, therefore, entitled to a compensation of Rs. 1,00,000/- as personal accident insurance cover.

2. In my view the Tribunal misinterpreted the judgment in Ningamma (supra), it was nowhere laid down in Nin



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top