SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Del) 3278

G.P.MITTAL
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
SUBODH – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Pankaj Seth, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

G.P. Mittal, J.

The Appellant New India Assurance Company Limited impugns the judgment dated 28.02.2008 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby while awarding a compensation of Rs. 40,000/-, the Claims Tribunal held that the first Respondent was competent to drive a Jeep as he was holding a valid driving licence to drive LMV.

2. It is a matter of record that the Insured vehicle bearing registration number DL-1LE-2172 (Mahendra Pick Up Van) was a goods carrying commercial vehicle, owned by M/s. Ajay Service Station, the Second Respondent. While making the Appellant Insurance Company liable to indemnify the award, the Claims Tribunal held as under:-

"16. The respondent no. 3 took the plea that the R-1 was not having valid and effective driving license at the time of accident so the RW2 examined two witnesses in this respect RW1 Padam Singh and RW2 Anil Kumar. RW1 Padam Singh, Record Keeper North Zone, Mall Road Authority deposed that as per his testimony that Rakesh Kumar Verma R-1 was having valid and effective driving license for LMV, non transport and motor cycle only and he proved its record as Ex.R3W1 and as per the testimony of RW2 who















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top