SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Del) 986

KAILASH GAMBHIR
Ajay Kumar Gaur – Appellant
Versus
Monika Sharma – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Ashutosh Kumar.
For the Respondent: Achin Aren.

JUDGMENT :

KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.

1. By this appeal filed u/s 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, the Appellant seeks to challenge the judgment and order dated 27.11.2008 passed by the Court of the learned ADJ, Delhi, whereby the divorce petition filed by the Appellant u/s 13(1)(ia) & (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act was dismissed.

2. Brief facts of the case relevant for deciding the present appeal are that the Appellant and Respondent got married on 23.1.2003 in Delhi according to Hindu rites and ceremonies and a female child was born out of the said wedlock on 17.5.2004. it is the case of the Appellant that the Respondent was suspicious about him having extra marital relations and that caused cruelty to him. He filed for divorce u/s 13(1) (ia) & (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 19555 which vide judgment dated 27.11.2008 was dismissed. Feeling aggrieved with the same the Appellant has filed the present appeal.

3. Mr. Ashutosh Kumar, counsel for the Petitioner states that the Appellant has successfully proved the cruel behaviour of the Respondent but still the learned trial court, ignoring the facts on record, dismissed the divorce petition. Counsel further submits that the Respondent, howev
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top