SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Del) 935

V.K.JAIN
Umesh Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Murari Tiwari.
For the Respondent: C.M. Verma.

JUDGMENT :

V.K. JAIN, J.

1. This is a petition u/s 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure challenging the Order of the learned Sessions Judge dated 29th January, 2009, whereby he directed respondent No. 2, Shri Satish Chand Sharma, husband of the petitioner-Umesh Sharma to pay rent of Rs. 5,000/- per month to her for maintaining an alternative accommodation w.e.f. 7th February, 2009. The petitioner was directed to vacate the shared household within 15 days of receiving the first payment of Rs. 5,000/-.

2. A perusal of the Order dated 16th April, 2008, passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, would show that the petitioner, Smt. Uma Sharma, filed an application u/s 12 of Protection of Woman from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, seeking restraint order against the respondents-Anirudh Sharma, who is her brother-in-law, Lalita Prasad Sharma, who is her father-in-law and Satish Chand Sharma, who is her husband, alleging torture and cruelty with her, besides demand of dowry and ill-treatment. She sought order restraining the respondents from dispossessing her or her son from shared flat bearing No. A-18-C, Second Floor, Janta Flats, Raghubir Nagar, New Delhi.

3. The respondents contested th












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top