SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Del) 4545

R.K.GAUBA
S. K. TANEJA – Appellant
Versus
AMARJEET SINGH – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Nitinjya Chaudhary with Rajiv Trivedi, Advocates.

JUDGMENT :

R.K. GAUBA, J.

1. Anjana Taneja (born on 01.09.1954), working as a stenographer in Punjab National Bank at the then gross salary of Rs. 14,314/- per month, died as a result of injuries suffered in a motor vehicular accident that occurred at about 6.15 PM on 30.05.2000 when the scooter bearing registration No. DAK 5568 (the scooter) on which she was riding pillion was involved in a collision with a blue line bus bearing registration No.DL 1PA 1974 (bus), admittedly insured against third party risk with the third respondent (insurer) for the period in question. Her husband and two children brought a claim petition under Sections 166 and 140 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (M V Act) before the motor accidents claims tribunal (tribunal) on 23.10.2000 whereupon it was registered as suit No. 411/2000. In the claim petition, the insurer, driver and the registered owner of the bus were impleaded as party respondents, on the basis of pleadings that the accident had occurred due to rash/negligent driving of the bus which had hit the scooter from behind. This contention was upheld on the basis of evidence led.

2. By judgment dated 13.03.2007, the tribunal awarded compensation in the sum o









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top