SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Del) 2489

KAILASH GAMBHIR
Sachin Malik – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Avinash Sharma and Mr. Rohit Gandhi
For the Respondent: Naveen Sharma, A.P.P.

ORDER :

KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.

1. By this petition filed u/s 482 of Cr.P.C. the petitioners seek quashing of the FIR No. 363/2008 registered against them under Sections 498A/406/307/506, IPC at P.S. H. Nizamuddin and criminal proceedings arising therefrom. Counsel for the petitioners state that the matter in dispute has been amicably settled between the parties with the intervention of Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee vide their order dated 7.8.2009. Counsel further submits that in terms of the said settlement arrived at between the parties, the petitioner has paid an amount of Rs. 5,25,000/- to the complainant in full and final settlement of all her material claims inclusive of Stridhan, maintenance (past, present and future), permanent alimony etc. Counsel also submits that the marriage of the parties has already been dissolved by mutual divorce vide judgment and decree dated 2.8.2010 passed by Ms. Raj Rani Mittra, ADJ, Patiala House Court. Counsel also submits that pursuant to the said settlement, the complainant has not pursued the petition filed by her u/s 125, Cr.P.C. and which already stands dismissed in default. Counsel also submits that no dispute of any nature any mor



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top