SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Del) 975

S.N.DHINGRA
SAROJ GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
RAM AKBAL – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Navneet Goyal and Mr. Varan Kumar, Adv.
For the Respondent: Ashok Popli, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Shiv Narayan Dhingra, J.

The present appeal has been preferred by the claimants against an award dated 28.5.1994 whereby the learned Tribunal awarded an amount of Rs. 5,40,000 as compensation to the claimants and held that respondent Nos. 1 and 3, i.e., M.M. Public School, owner of Matador No. DEP 3723 and its driver Ram Akbal were liable to pay the amount. The claimants have sought enhancement in the compensation amount and the award is assailed also on the ground that insurance company was liable to pay the damages.

2. Cross-objections were preferred by respondent No. 3, i.e., M.M. Public School, submitting that the insurance company alone was liable to pay the entire compensation amount and not the driver and owner of Matador since the vehicle was duly insured by the owner with the insurance company. However, the respondents were proceeded ex parte by the Tribunal as the advocate engaged by the respondents failed to discharge his duty and did not bring it to the knowledge of the Tribunal that the vehicle was duly insured. It was submitted that the Tribunal has exonerated insurance company on the ground that the insurance company had denied the insurance. However, the ins













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top