J.R.MIDHA
KEITH ROWE – Appellant
Versus
PRASHANT SAGAR – Respondent
J.R. Midha, J.
The appellant has challenged the award of the learned Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs. 4,93,000/- has been awarded to the appellant. The appellants seek enhancement of the award amount.
2. The accident dated 11th February, 2001 resulted in the death of Parminder Kaur Rowe. The deceased was survived by her husband who filed the claim petition before the learned Tribunal.
3. The deceased was aged 31 years at the time of the accident. The appellant is her husband who was about 38 years at the time of the accident. There are no children out of the wedlock of the appellant and the deceased. The deceased was working as Executive Assistant with M/s. Invensys India Private Ltd. at a monthly salary of Rs. 20,000/-. The employment of the deceased was proved by appointment letter dated 9th May, 2000 - Ex.PW-1/13. Form-16 dated 30th April, 2001 relating to the Income Tax deducted by the employer was proved as Ex.PW-1/14. The appellant claimed that the deceased was also Director in the Private Limited Company of the appellant named H.R. Solutions Pvt. Ltd. The Income
Gobald Motor Service Ltd. and Another Vs. R.M.K. Veluswami and Others
Gulam Khader and Another Vs. United India Insurance Company Limited and Another
Madhya Pradesh State Road Transport Corpn., Bairagarh Vs. Sudhakar etc.
Ramesh Chandra and Others Vs. Madhya Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, Bhopal and Others
Smt. Sarla Verma and Others Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and Another
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. and Another Vs. Chandi Rai and Another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.