SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Del) 930

J.R.MIDHA
KEITH ROWE – Appellant
Versus
PRASHANT SAGAR – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Rajesh Yadav and Ruchira V. Arora, Adv
For the Respondent: Atul Nanda and Sanjay Bhardwaj, Adv.

JUDGMENT

J.R. Midha, J.

The appellant has challenged the award of the learned Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs. 4,93,000/- has been awarded to the appellant. The appellants seek enhancement of the award amount.

2. The accident dated 11th February, 2001 resulted in the death of Parminder Kaur Rowe. The deceased was survived by her husband who filed the claim petition before the learned Tribunal.

3. The deceased was aged 31 years at the time of the accident. The appellant is her husband who was about 38 years at the time of the accident. There are no children out of the wedlock of the appellant and the deceased. The deceased was working as Executive Assistant with M/s. Invensys India Private Ltd. at a monthly salary of Rs. 20,000/-. The employment of the deceased was proved by appointment letter dated 9th May, 2000 - Ex.PW-1/13. Form-16 dated 30th April, 2001 relating to the Income Tax deducted by the employer was proved as Ex.PW-1/14. The appellant claimed that the deceased was also Director in the Private Limited Company of the appellant named H.R. Solutions Pvt. Ltd. The Income


























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top