MUKTA GUPTA
Gulfam – Appellant
Versus
State of Govt. of NCT of Delhi – Respondent
1. By the present appeal, Gulfam and Mustar Jahan challenge the impugned judgment dated 11th October, 2017 convicting them for the offences punishable under Sections 448/304-II/34 IPC in FIR No. 222/2012 registered at PS Jagat Puri and the order on sentence dated 30th October, 2017 directing them to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of seven years and to pay a fine of Rs.5000/-; in default thereof to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of three months for the offence punishable under Section 304 Part-II/34 IPC and rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months for the offence punishable under Section 448/34 IPC.
2. Assailing the conviction, learned counsel for the appellants contends that there was no allegation of any head injury. Furthermore, as per the postmortem report, the deceased Mohd. Jamil was suffering from broncho-pneumonia and the same has been proved during the cross examination of Dr. Aistesh Bajwa (PW-1).
3. Process of law was set into motion on 2nd June 2012 at around 12:40 P.M. when a call was received pertaining to a quarrel having taken place at Khureji Khas, Kasai Wali Gali, near MCD School. Aforesaid information was lodged by DD No.28A (Ex
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.