SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Del) 1828

SUNIL GAUR
BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD – Appellant
Versus
PAPPU – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. M.P. Sahi, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Mukesh Kumar Sinha, Mr. Bhupinder Narula, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

C.M.No. 42285/2016 (u/S 151 CPC) in MAC.APP. 946/2016

C.M.No.42362/2016 (u/S 151 CPC) in MAC.APP. 948/2016

C.M.No.42365/2016 (u/S 151 CPC) in MAC.APP. 949/2018

C.M.No. 42367/2016 (u/S 151 CPC) in MAC.APP. 950/2016

There is delay of 37 days in filing the accompanying appeals.

The reasons stated in the applications provide sufficient cause to condone the delay occasioned. The applications are allowed and delay is condoned.

The above captioned four applications are disposed of.

C.M.No. 44345/2016 (u/Order 6 Rule 17 CPC) in MAC.APP. 946/2016

By way of this application, name of Smt. Saraswati Devi, mother of deceased, is sought to be added in the Memo of Parties on the plea that due to inadvertence, her name was left out although her name finds mention in the modified Award. Counsel for appellant has handed over certified copy of order of 8th June, 2017 of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, which reveals that name of Smt. Saraswati Devi, has been added as a party to the claim petition and upon apportionment, part of the compensation amount has been awarded to her.

In view of above, th



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top