G.S. SISTANI, J.

1. Although process fee has been returned with objection, Mr. V.K. Gupta, learned Senior Counsel, on instructions, has entered appearance on behalf of the respondent on an advance copy having been served and submits that the appeal is not maintainable.

2. Challenge in this appeal is to the order dated 04.07.2018 and 09.07.2018 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Saket, New Delhi. We may note that this matter was listed on 03.08.2018 when we had passed the following order:

“MAT.APP.(F.C.) 182/2018 & CM No.30797/2018 (stay)

Challenge in this appeal is to the orders dated 04.07.2018 and 09.07.2018 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Saket, New Delhi.

Mr. Singh, counsel for the appellant submits that on account of slanderous and sensitive nature of allegation made against the appellant, the appellant could not appear for recording of evidence before the local Commissioner appointed by the Family Court. While prima facie we find no infirmity in the orders passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court who has also directed to record the evidence of the appellant in Camera. However, we are of the view that a lady local Commissioner should be appointed