MUKTA GUPTA, J.

1. By these appeals, appellants Pushpa, Poonam, Pooja, Raju and Vijay @ Vinay @ Bable challenge the impugned judgment dated 30th November, 2016 wherein Pushpa, Poonam and Pooja were convicted for offences punishable under Section 394 IPC read with Section 395/34 IPC and Section 412 IPC and Raju and Vijay @ Vinay @ Bable were convicted for offences punishable under Section 395 read with Sections 397/412 IPC in FIR No. 369/2011 registered at PS Prashant Vihar and the order on sentence dated 5th December, 2016 directing Pushpa, Poonam and Pooja to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/- each and in default whereof to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one month each for the offence punishable under Section 394 IPC read with Section 395/34 IPC and rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/- each and in default whereof to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one month each for the offence punishable under Section 412 IPC. Raju and Vijay @ Vinay @ Bable were directed to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years and to pay a fine of Rs. 10,000/