ANU MALHOTRA, J.

1. Vide the present appeal FAO 401/2018, the appellant assails the impugned order dated 07.06.2018 and 09.08.2018 of the Trial Court of the learned ADJ-03 (South), Saket Courts, New Delhi whereby it was observed by the learned Trial Court to the effect that before passing an appropriate order under Order XL Rule 1 CPC, it was considered expedient to issue summons of the suit to the defendant on filing of PF and by way of registered post with acknowledgement due and all other modes of service as approved. The appellant thus seeks the appointment of an ex-parte receiver to take over the possession of the vehicle MARUTI BALENO / DELTA CVT bearing registration no. HR-26CW-3610 from the possession of the respondent.

2. The grievance of the appellant is to the effect that the ex-parte receiver as prayed by the appellant for seizure of the vehicle referred hereinabove was not appointed. It has been averred by the appellant that the respondent in April, 2016 had requested the appellant for grant of loan to the tune of Rs.6,50,000/- for purchase of the vehicle MARUTI BALENO / DELTA CVT bearing registration no. HR-26CW-3610 and entered into a loan agreement under the