SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Del) 2301

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
Raju – Appellant
Versus
Neelam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. R.K. Bali, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

CMs No.37815/2018 & 37816/2018 in CM(M) No.1109/2018 (both for exemption) & CM No.37678/2018 in FAO No.431/2018 (for exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

2. The applications are disposed of.

CM(M) No.1109/2018 & CM No.37817/2018 (for stay) &

FAO No.431/2018 & CM No.37679/2018 (for condonation of 48 days delay in re-filing the appeal)

3. Both proceedings are taken up together as entail common question of law i.e., interdiction by Family Courts Act, 1984 of remedies against orders in proceedings under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

4. CM(M) No.1109/2018 under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order [dated 24th July, 2018 in M No.08/2018 of the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Shahdara] of dismissal of an application filed by the petitioner under Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) and under Section 126(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC), for setting aside of the ex-parte order dated 21st February, 2017.

5. The petitioner has not filed the copy of the ex-parte order dated 21st February, 2017, setting aside whereof was sought by filing application which has been dismissed. The petitioner has also not place
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top