SANJEEV SACHDEVA
Suryakant Sandibigraha – Appellant
Versus
State Govt. of Nct of Delhi – Respondent
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.
1. The petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No. 17 of 2017 under Sections 408/419/420/467/468/471/447A/120B/34 of the IPC and Section 66 (C) (D) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, Police Station EOW Wing.
2. The allegations in the FIR are that the complainant had opened a proprietorship concern for manufacturing and trading office furniture. Petitioner no. 1 was the accountant of petitioner no. 2, Service In charge of the said concern. The husband of the prosecutrix was running, controlling and managing affairs of her business besides running another proprietorship concern.
3. It is contended that in the year 2008 husband of the prosecutrix was diagnosed with serious health problem because of which the prosecutrix herself became busy in his treatment and entrusted all accounting responsibilities to petitioner no. 1, being the senior most employee of the firm.
4. It is contended that in July, 2016 when the condition of her husband improved, he started involving himself in the affairs of her concern as well as his concern and noticed suspicious transactions in the accounts of both firms, inter-alia, in ticket bookings, online shopping, Paytm recharges
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.