PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Maya Devi – Appellant
Versus
Rajeshwar – Respondent
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
I.A. 11387/2018 (for addition and deletion of D-18)
1. The impleadment sought of Tehsildar of Kapashera is permitted. I.A. is disposed of.
I.A. 7129/2018 (Under Order XXII Rule 4 CPC)
2. This is an application for seeking impleadment of the legal heirs of Defendant No. 12. Admittedly, Defendant No. 12 never appeared in the matter, however, her legal heirs impleaded for the sake of completeness. I.A. is allowed in the above terms.
I.A. 7130/2018 (for setting aside abatement of the suit) & I.A. 7131/2018 (for delay of 300 days in filing the application)
3. Since the impleadment of the legal heirs of Defendant No. 12 is allowed, these two applications for abatement and delay become infructuous and the same are disposed of.
I.As. 14776/2015 (for delay in filing written statement) & 11984/2015 (Under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC)
4. The written statements are taken on record and the applications are disposed of.
I.As. 6875/2015 & 8093/2015 (Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC)
5. The present applications have been filed under Order VII Rule 11 CPC seeking rejection of the plaint on various grounds. The grounds taken in the Order VII Rule 11 application are two fold. Firstly, it i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.