SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Del) 2473

PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Bharat Battery Manufacturing Company Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. R.V. Sinha, Mr. A.S. Singh.
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajesh Banati, Mr. Ankit Banati, Mr. B.K. Goswami.

JUDGMENT :

PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.

1. The present petition challenges the impugned award dated 24th June, 2008 passed by the Learned Sole Arbitrator – Justice K.S. Gupta (Retired). The brief background of the case is that a tender was called by the Union of India for supply of batteries. The Respondent submitted its offer on 7th October, 2002. The batteries were “secondary lead acid portable” of 6V 170 AH and 12V 75AH, for which the Respondent quoted a price of Rs. 2070 and Rs.1871 per battery respectively. The supplies were for Defence requirements. The offer given by the Respondent on 7th October, 2002 was considered by the Petitioner and vide letter dated 26th March, 2003, the Respondent was called upon to give its best reduced revised rates. The Respondent thereafter submitted its revised offer vide letter dated 8th April, 2003 and reduced the prices to Rs. 1829 and Rs. 1749 for the 6V and 12V batteries respectively. Supplies were made by the Respondent against various purchase orders.

2. Disputes arose between the parties because the Respondent claimed price variation as per cl
















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top