SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Del) 2518

R.K.GAUBA
DEEPAK KUMAR @ DEEPAK KUMAR SAHA – Appellant
Versus
OMBIR SINGH – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ms. Priya Hingorani, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. Arun K. Sharma, APP

ORDER :

1. The petitioner had approached the Metropolitan Magistrate with a complaint (CC-99/01/14) invoking the jurisdiction of the said court under Section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr. PC) read with Section 156 (3) Cr. PC to seek initiation of action against the first to fourth respondents herein alleging offences punishable under Sections 120B, 166, 166A, 177, 181, 182, 187, 193, 195, 196, 197, 198, 200, 211, 209, 210, 219, 465, 466, 471 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) having been committed by them. His said complaint and prayer under Section 156(3) Cr. PC were dismissed by the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate by order dated 05.11.2014. He challenged the said order before the court of Sessions by criminal revision petition (no.98/14) invoking its jurisdiction under Section 397 Cr. PC. The revision petition was dismissed by the court of Sessions by order dated 07.01.2015.

2. Feeling aggrieved, the petitioner has come up before this court by the petition at hand invoking its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr. PC to assail the orders of the two courts below.

3. The name of the petitioner had figured in the investigation into FIR no.69/2007 of police station














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top