1. Petitioner is aggrieved by impugned order of 26th June, 2009 wherein the finding returned is as under :-

“In fact, as per the Scheme, for allotment of the land within the Lal Dora, there is a provision that the person should be the resident of the Village for more than 20 years and the respondent No.5 is not the resident of the Village and as such he is not entitled for allotment of any land. In lieu of withdrawal, he can be easily allotted agricultural land. After all, he cannot be given any benefit of allotment of the land within the Lal Dora. If he is being given the benefit of allotment of the land within the Lal Dora then it will amount to violating the Scheme or with the gazette notification issued by the Government of NCT of Delhi, which is the guiding principle for allotment of the land to the persons, who are residents of the Village for more than 20 years or so.”

2. The stand of petitioner, as noticed in the impugned order, is as under:-

“That the basic claim of Petitioners is based on the provisions of consolidation Scheme and the same has been admitted during the course of arguments by the counsels for the respondents. It is specific submission of the petition