VALMIKI J.MEHTA
SHASHI – Appellant
Versus
NAVEEN SANGHAVI – Respondent
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J
1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit impugning the judgment of the Trial Court whereby the Trial Court has decreed the suit for recovery of Rs. 2,10,000/- alongwith interest, and this amount is held in as liable to be paid/refunded because it was the appellant/defendant who had failed to perform her part of the contract/Agreement to Sell and thus because of committing breach, the amount received of Rs. 2,10,000/- under the subject agreement to sell cannot be forfeited.
2. I need not narrate the facts in detail because entering into the Agreement to Sell between the parties dated 7.5.2011, Ex.PW1/2 is not disputed. That the appellant received a sum of Rs.2,10,000/- under the Agreement to Sell dated 17.5.2011 is also not disputed by the appellant/defendant. In my opinion, there is no need to go into the aspect as to whether or not the respondent/plaintiff was guilty of breach of contract, or instead whether the appellant/defendant was or was not guilty of breach o
Fateh Chand Vs. Balkishan Dass AIR 1963 SC 1405
Kailash Nath Associates Vs. Delhi Development Authority and Another (2015) 4 SCC 136
Maula Bux v. Union of India (UOI)
M.C. Luthra Vs. Ashok Kumar Khanna 2018 (248) DLT 161
Shree Hanuman Cotton Mills & Anr. V. Tata Aircraft Ltd.
Shree Hanuman Cotton Mills and Others v. Tata Air Craft Limited
Shree Hanuman Cotton Mills and Anr. v. Tata Aircraft Limited
Videocon Properties Ltd. Vs. Dr. Bhalchandra Laboratories and Others (2004) 3 SCC 711
V.K. Ashokan Vs. Assistant Excise Commissioner and Others (2009) 14 SCC 85
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.