SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Del) 2763

VALMIKI J.MEHTA
ANITA RANI MANGLA – Appellant
Versus
BHAGWAT DAYAL – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. H.S. Gautam, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Rupesh Kumar and Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocates

JUDGMENT :

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J

RFA No. 332/2018 and C.M. Appl. No. 15540/2018 (for stay)

1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 03.04.2018 by which the trial court has dismissed the suit of the appellant/plaintiff as barred by time. The suit has been held as barred by time on the ground that the suit for cancellation of the impugned documents dated 17.09.1999 has been filed in July, 2017 i.e. beyond the period of three years limitation prescribed under Articles 58 and 59 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

2. A reading of the plaint shows that the appellant/plaintiff in the suit has prayed for cancellation of the subject documents dated 17.09.1999, being the Agreement to Sell, General Power of Attorney, Affidavit, etc. whereby the respondent no. 1/defendant no. 1 is said to have been transferred the suit property by the appellant/plaintiff. The suit property being property bearing No. E-7, Hari Nagar, Part-II, Badarpur, New Delhi.

3. The appellant/plaintiff in the plaint has repeatedly pleaded that the documents dated 17.09.1999 are forged and fabricated docum








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top