SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Del) 2814

VALMIKI J.MEHTA
Atma Ram Properties Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Allied Motors Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Amit Sethi.

JUDGMENT :

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J.

CM No. 34266/2018 (Exemption)

Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions.

CM stands disposed of.

RFA No. 700/2018 & CM No. 34265/2018 (stay)

1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff/landlord in the suit impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 2.8.2018 by which the trial court has rejected the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC and held that the civil court has no jurisdiction to entertain the suit for possession and mesne profits filed by the appellant/plaintiff. In essence the trial court has held two aspects against the appellant/plaintiff/landlord. Firstly it is held that the amount of house tax payable by a tenant will not become part of the rent, and once that is not part of the rent, the rent payable by the respondent/defendant/tenant cannot be said to have increased beyond Rs. 3,500/- per month for the suit/subject premises ceased to have protection under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958. Secondly, it was held by the trial court that when a legal notice is given under Section 6A of the Delhi Rent Control Act for increasing of the rent, the rent will be increased pros























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top