VIPIN SANGHI, I.S.MEHTA
Mahesh Chaudhary – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
I.S. Mehta, J.
1. The Appellant Mahesh Chaudhary and Rajesh Chaudhary have preferred two separate appeal i.e. (Crl. A. 535/2015 & Crl. A. 774/2015) under Section 374 Read with Section 482 Cr.P.C., against a common judgment and order on sentence dated 29.11.2014 and 02.12.2014 respectively by which both the Appellants have been convicted under Section 120B IPC, 394/120B IPC and 302/34 IPC. For the offence under Section 302/34 IPC, they have been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and fine of Rs. 40,000/- each and in default of payment of fine further undergo simple imprisonment for six months; for the offence under Section 394 read with Section 120B IPC, rigorous imprisonment of five years and fine of Rs. 10,000/- each and in default of payment of fine to further undergo two months simple imprisonment; for the offence under Section 120B IPC, rigorous imprisonment for five years and a fine of Rs. 10, 000/- each and in default of payment of fine further undergo simple imprisonment for two months. All substantive sentences were directed to run concurrentl
Amitava Banerjee v. State of West Bengal
Anjan Kumar Sarma v. State of Assam
Bodh Raj v. State of Jammu and Kashmir
Lallan Rai and Others V. State of Bihar
M.G. Agarwalv. State of Maharashtra
Nagraj V. State Rep. By Inspector of Police
Pandurang, Tukia And Bhillia V. State of Hyderabad
Shankarlal Gyarasilal Dixit v. State of Maharashtra
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v. State of Maharashtra
State (NCT of Delhi) v. Navjot Sandhu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.