VALMIKI J.MEHTA
Sudesh Kakkar – Appellant
Versus
Satish Mittal – Respondent
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J.
1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 28.11.2016 by which trial court has dismissed the suit for recovery of money filed by the appellant/plaintiff/proposed buyer against the respondent/defendant/proposed seller. A money decree of Rs.6,46,500/- was prayed by the appellant/plaintiff on the ground that the amount of Rs.6 lacs was paid under the subject Agreement to Sell and this should be returned along with interest totaling to the amount of Rs.6,46,500/-.
2. I need not narrate the facts in detail because admittedly with respect to property no. D/E-53, Sector-3, DSIIDC Industrial Park, Bawana, Delhi-39 on 17.12.2011 parties entered into an Agreement to Sell for a total sale consideration of Rs.72.51 lacs and out of this total amount, a sum of Rs.6 lacs has admittedly been received by the respondent/defendant from the appellant/plaintiff. Pleading that it was not the appellant/plaintiff, but it was the respondent/def
Fateh Chand Vs. Balkishan Dass
Kailash Nath Associates Vs. Delhi Development Authority and Another
M.C. Luthra Vs. Ashok Kumar Khanna
Maula Bux v. Union of India, (UOI)
Shree Hanuman Cotton Mills & Anr. V. Tata Aircraft Ltd.
Shree Hanuman Cotton Mills and Anr. v. Tata Aircraft Limited
Shree Hanuman Cotton Mills and Others v. Tata Air Craft Limited
South Eastern Coalfileds Ltd. Vs. State of M.P. and Others
V.K. Ashokan Vs. Assistant Excise Commissioner and Others
Videocon Properties Ltd. Vs. Dr. Bhalchandra Laboratories and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.