RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
SUDESH BALA – Appellant
Versus
VINOD KUMAR – Respondent
1. The five plaintiffs namely (i) Smt. Sudesh Bala; (ii) Smt. Aadesh; (iii) Smt. Suresh; (iv) Smt. Minakshi; and, (v) Smt. Kamal have instituted the present suit for (a) declaration of the Sale Deed dated 15th September, 2004 executed by defendant No.1 in favour of the defendant No.2 in respect of 1/16th share in Khasra No.58 (1-18) and 78/11 (2-0) situated in Extended Laldora of Village Samalkha, Delhi to be null and void and not binding on the plaintiffs; (b) declaration that the Gift Deed dated 10th November, 2006 executed by defendant No.2 in favour of the defendant No.1 in respect of 1/16th share in Khasra No.58 (1-18) and 78/11 (2-0) situated in Extended Laldora of Village Samalkha, Delhi is null and void and not binding on the plaintiffs; (c) declaration of the Sale Deed dated 14th February, 2006 executed by defendant No.1 in favour of the defendant No.3 in respect of 1/16th share in Khasra No.58 (1-18) and 78/11 (2-0) situated in Extended Laldora of Village Samalkha, Delhi to be null and void and not binding on the plaintiffs; (d) declaration of the Sale Deed dated 5th May, 2009 executed by defendant No.1 in favour of the defendant No.2 with respect to built up pr
Muddasani Venkata Narasaiah Vs. Muddasani Sarojana (2016) 12 SCC 288
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.