SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Del) 3059

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
SUDESH BALA – Appellant
Versus
VINOD KUMAR – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Sumit Kumar, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

1. The five plaintiffs namely (i) Smt. Sudesh Bala; (ii) Smt. Aadesh; (iii) Smt. Suresh; (iv) Smt. Minakshi; and, (v) Smt. Kamal have instituted the present suit for (a) declaration of the Sale Deed dated 15th September, 2004 executed by defendant No.1 in favour of the defendant No.2 in respect of 1/16th share in Khasra No.58 (1-18) and 78/11 (2-0) situated in Extended Laldora of Village Samalkha, Delhi to be null and void and not binding on the plaintiffs; (b) declaration that the Gift Deed dated 10th November, 2006 executed by defendant No.2 in favour of the defendant No.1 in respect of 1/16th share in Khasra No.58 (1-18) and 78/11 (2-0) situated in Extended Laldora of Village Samalkha, Delhi is null and void and not binding on the plaintiffs; (c) declaration of the Sale Deed dated 14th February, 2006 executed by defendant No.1 in favour of the defendant No.3 in respect of 1/16th share in Khasra No.58 (1-18) and 78/11 (2-0) situated in Extended Laldora of Village Samalkha, Delhi to be null and void and not binding on the plaintiffs; (d) declaration of the Sale Deed dated 5th May, 2009 executed by defendant No.1 in favour of the defendant No.2 with respect to built up pr

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top