SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

1. Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.00092/2017, under Sections 366/376/506IPC, PS North Rohini.

2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the subject FIR is not an FIR on the complaint of one Smt. Anshu but is an FIR which is a counterblast to the complaint made by the petitioner against some police officials of PS North Rohini.

3. It is contended that there was a dispute between the petitioner and Smt. Anshu with regard to dishonour of certain cheques consequent to which the petitioner filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against Smt. Anshu in the year 2015.

4. It is further contended that petitioner was assaulted by the husband of the alleged complainant in the year 2017. It is contended that as the police officials were threatening petitioner to withdraw the complaint under Section 138 of the NI Act as well as not to initiate proceedings for assault, a complaint was made with higher officers qua the police officials. It is stated that as a counterblast to the said complaint against the police officers, the subject FIR has been registered alleging the same to be on the complaint of Smt.Anshu