2018 Supreme(Del) 3154
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
A.K. PATHAK, J.
Pappu Kumar & Kallu – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Crl. A. Nos. 154 of 2014, 558 of 2016
Decided On : 17-04-2018
For the Appellant : Ms. Rajni Singh.
For the Respondent: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of the Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) Form in ruling out tampering of samples and the fatal impact of non-compliance with the mandatory requirement of the FSL form in the prosecution's case.
Headnote:
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - Conviction under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) and Section 20(b)(ii)(B) - [Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 20(b)(ii)(C), Section 20(b)(ii)(B)] - The court found discrepancies and inconsistencies in the prosecution's story, making the recovery of ganja from the appellants' possession suspicious. The court highlighted the importance of the Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) Form in ruling out tampering of samples and emphasized that non-compliance with the mandatory requirement of preparation and dispatch of the FSL form with the sample sent for testing is fatal to the case of the prosecution. The court concluded that the appellants were entitled to the benefit of doubt and acquitted them.
Fact of the Case:
The appellants were convicted under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act for possession and supply of ganja. The prosecution's story of the raid and recovery of ganja from the appellants' possession was found to have inherent discrepancies and inconsistencies, casting doubt on the validity of the recovery.
Finding of the Court:
The court found the prosecution's story to be suspicious and highlighted the importance of the FSL Form in ruling out tampering of samples. It concluded that the appellants were entitled to the benefit of doubt and acquitted them.
Issues: The issues revolved around the validity of the recovery of ganja from the appellants' possession, the discrepancies in the statements of recovery witnesses, and the non-compliance with the mandatory requirement of the FSL Form.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of the FSL Form in ruling out tampering of samples and held that non-compliance with the mandatory requirement of preparation and dispatch of the FSL form with the sample sent for testing is fatal to the case of the prosecution. It also highlighted the discrepancies in the statements of recovery witnesses and the lack of support from public witnesses.
Final Decision: The court set aside the impugned judgment and acquitted the appellants, stating that they were entitled to the benefit of doubt. The appellant-Pappu Kumar @ Kallu was ordered to be released forthwith, and appellant-Deepak Sharma was stated to have already completed his sentence.
A.K. PATHAK, J.
1. Vide judgment dated 5th September, 2013 of the trial court appellant-Pappu Kumar @ Kallu has been convicted under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (the Act, for short); whereas appellant-Deepak Sharma has been convicted under Section 20(b)(ii)(B) of the Act. By the order on sentence dated 3rd October, 2013, Pappu Kumar @ Kallu has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment of 12 years with fine of Rs. 1.50 lacs and in default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment of 2 years; while Deepak Sharma has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment of 4 years with fine of Rs. 50,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment of 6 months. Aggrieved by their conviction as also the sentences handed down to them, appellants have preferred abovenoted appeals.
2. Prosecution story, as unfolded from the perusal of charge-sheet, is that a secret informer came in the SIT Office on 24th April, 2011 at about 12:30 pm and informed Const. Sandeep that at about 2/3 pm appellants would come to Budh Vihar, Kanjhawla Road, near Brahm Shakti Hospital to supply large quantity of ganja to someone. Const. Sandeep produced the secret informer before SI Sharat Kohli who, in turn, produced him before the Additional DCP/SIT. After hearing the secret informer, Additional DCP ordered for appropriate action to apprehend the culprits. Accordingly, DD No. 5 dated 24th April, 2011 was recorded and forwarded to senior officers in compliance of Section 42 of the Act. SI Sharat Kohli constituted a raiding party comprising of HC Bahadur Sharma, HC Shyam Lal, HC Rajender Kumar, HC Amit Tomar, Const. Dabbu Kanwar, Const. Narender Kumar, Const. Vikas Rana, Const. Sandeep and Const. Sunny Sangwan.
3. At about 01:15 pm, raiding party along with secret informer proceeded towards Khanjhawla Road, Brahm Shakti Hospital. On reaching there, eight to ten passersby were requested to join the raiding party but they declined on one or the other pretext. At about 02:30 pm two young boys (appellants) were seen coming from a street near telephone exchange towards the Brahm Shakti Hospital. They were carrying bags with them. They stopped at about 10 steps away from Brahm Shakti Hosptial and kept their bags on the ground. On pointing of the secret informer, appellants were apprehended. Notice under Section 50 of the Act was served on them. However, they refused, in writing, to go to the nearest Gazetted Officer of any of the departments mentioned in Section 42 of the Act or to the nearest Magistrate to get their search conducted before either of them. From red coloured bag, which Pappu Kumar @ Kallu was carrying, 10 polythene packets were recovered. On opening the same ganja weighing 10 kgs was recovered. Out of which, 250 gms ganja taken as sample. Thereafter, blue coloured bag, which Deepak Sharma was carrying, was opened in which also 10 polythene packets were recovered. On opening the same 10 kgs ganja was recovered. Out of which, 250 gms ganja was taken as a sample. Case property was then sealed with the seal of SK. Katta as well as pulandas containing the samples were seized.
4. Pappu Kumar @ Kallu disclosed that he and Deepak Sharma were living as tenants in the house no. O-1/46, Budh Vihar, Phase I, Delhi for last five to six years. They used to bring ganja from Orissa and store the same in their house and thereafter distribute the same to customers. They further disclosed that large quantity of ganja was lying in the tenanted premises as well. Accordingly, SI Sharat Kohli along with raiding party and appellants reached the aforesaid house where they met one Rajesh, son of owner, namely, Bhim Singh, who confirmed that appellants had been living at the first floor as tenants. Rajesh was joined in the investigation. Appellants took the raiding party to first floor. Appellant Pappu Kumar @ Kallu opened the room by taking out keys from his pocket and got recovered 5 bags. On opening the