SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Del) 3220

ANU MALHOTRA
Ram Kumar Jain – Appellant
Versus
Savitri Devi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Shiv Charan Garg, Advocate

ORDER :

Anu Malhotra, J.

CM No. 26487/2018 (Exemption)

Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions.

CM(M) 738/2018

1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner assails the impugned order dated 2.5.2018 of the learned Trial Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Rohini Courts in CS No. 537557/2016 whereby an application under Order 6 Rule 2 under Section 151, CPC filed on behalf of the defendant, i.e., the petitioners herein, submitting to the effect that the evidence of the PW-2 and PW-3 would not be considered as the same was led beyond the pleadings and a question of law had been raised by the learned Counsel for the defendant in para 3 of the affidavit of evidence of PW-2 and the plaintiff could not be allowed to depose in the evidence, was disposed of by the learned Trial Court observing to the effect that the application cannot be considered as the defendant has an opportunity to raise the plea at the time of final arguments as PW 2 has already been examined in chief and partly cross-examined and PW-3 examined in chief and his cross-examination was deferred and the case was at the stage of trial.

2. Inter alia, reliance has been placed on behalf of the defendant, i.e., the petitioner he






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top