SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Del) 24

SANJIV KHANNA, CHANDER SHEKHAR
FORUM OF RETIRED IPS OFFICERS (FORIPSO) – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Dr. Ashok Dhamija and Mr. Alabhya Dhamija, Advocates.
For the Respondents:Dr. Ashwini Bhardwaj, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

SANJIV KHANNA, J.

The petitioner, Forum of Retired Indian Police Service (IPS) Officers, is a Non-Government Origination and a non-political forum based, established and registered as a society under the provisions of Societies Registration Act, 1860. Members of the petitioner society are primarily retired Indian police officers including senior citizens aged ninety years or more. Petitioner society, it is stated, is primarily engaged in welfare and getting justice to pensioners.

2. The petitioner vide the present Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has sought following reliefs :-

“(a) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, striking down Rule 10A of the Central Civil Services (Commutation of Pension) Rules, 1981 which lays down rule for recovery of the amount of commuted pension for 15 years, and directing the Respondents to reduce the recovery period of the amount of commuted pension for pensioners who retired from the All India Services or from the Central Civil Services-

- from the existing recover period of 15 years to the actual rec





















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top