HIMA KOHLI, MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Satish – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J.
1. The present appeals have been filed challenging the judgment of conviction dated 24.01.2004 arising out of Sessions Case No.110/2002 in FIR No.421/2000 for the offences punishable under Sections 302/307/460/34 IPC at P.S. Mehrauli whereunder, both the appellants were sentenced:-
(i) to undergo life imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- each and in default thereof to further undergo RI for 15 days for the offence punishable under Section 302/34 IPC;
(ii) to undergo RI for four years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- each and in default thereof to further undergo RI for 15 days for the offence punishable under Section 460/34 IPC; and
(iii) to undergo RI for four years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- each and in default thereof, to further undergo RI for 15 days for the offence punishable under Section 307/34 IPC.
2. Benefit of Section 428 Cr.P.C. was given to both the appellants and their sentences were directed to run concurrently. Both the appeals shall be disposed by this common judgment.
3. The case of the prosecution, as noted by the trial court is:
"2. The case of prosecution is that in the intervening night of 01 & 02.07.2000 an information was
Brahm Swaroop & Anr. Vs. State of U.P.
Dr. Sunil Kumar Sambhudayal Gupta & Ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mahendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Shankar Vs. State of Karnataka
State of Rajasthan Vs. Rajendra Singh
State of U.P. Vs. Naresh & Ors.
State Represented by Inspector of Police Vs. Saravanan & Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.