SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Del) 607

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
Adidas AG and Another - Appellant
Versus
Praveen Kumar and Others - Respondent
Civil Suit (Comm) No. 1269 of 2018; Interlocutory Application No. 16629 of 2018
Decided on : 14-05-2019

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Binod Kumar Jha, Adv., Navin Gupta, Adv., Hemant Singh, Adv., Waseem Shuaib Ahmed, Adv., Abhijeeet Rastogi, Adv.

The central legal point established in the judgment is the ownership and protection of the 'THREE STRIPES' device mark, leading to the grant of a permanent injunction and the award of damages against the Defendants for infringement.

Headnote:

Trade Mark Infringement - Three Stripes Mark - Trade Mark Registrations - India - 932041, 511874, 2983183 - The court granted a permanent injunction in favor of the Plaintiffs against the Defendants for infringement of the 'THREE STRIPES' device mark. The Defendants were found selling footwear bearing the mark and the Plaintiffs' ownership of the mark was established based on pleadings and documents. The court also awarded damages against the Defendants for the infringement.

Fact of the Case:

The Plaintiffs, leading manufacturers of ADIDAS athletic footwear, filed a suit for permanent injunction against the Defendants for infringement of the 'THREE STRIPES' device mark. The Defendants were found selling footwear bearing the mark, and the Plaintiffs' ownership of the mark was established based on pleadings and documents.

Finding of the Court:

The court found in favor of the Plaintiffs and granted a permanent injunction against the Defendants for infringement of the 'THREE STRIPES' device mark. The court also awarded damages against the Defendants for the infringement.

Issues: Infringement of the 'THREE STRIPES' device mark, ownership of the mark, and liability for damages.

Ratio Decidendi: The Plaintiffs' ownership of the 'THREE STRIPES' device mark was established based on pleadings and documents. The Defendants were found selling footwear bearing the mark, and the court granted a permanent injunction in favor of the Plaintiffs and awarded damages against the Defendants for the infringement.

Final Decision: The court decreed a permanent injunction in favor of the Plaintiffs against the Defendants for infringement of the 'THREE STRIPES' device mark. Damages were awarded against the Defendants for the infringement.

JUDGMENT :

PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.

1. The Plaintiffs have filed the present suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trade mark, passing off, unfair competition, for rendition of accounts of profits/damages, delivery up etc.

2. The Plaintiff No.1 M/s Adidas AG and its Indian subsidiary Adidas India Marketing Pvt. Ltd. - Plaintiff No.2 (together referred to as 'Plaintiffs'), claim to be one of the world's leading manufacturers of ADIDAS athletic footwear, sportswear, and sporting equipment.

3. The Plaintiff No. 1 was founded in Germany in 1920 and since then has expanded to a global market into several countries. It is stated in the plaint that the 'THREE STRIPES' device mark since its adoption in 1949, almost 80 years ago, has been exclusively associated with the Plaintiffs. The said mark has been promoted by various sporting celebrities including Sh. Milkha Singh, the legendary Indian Olympian. The 'THREE STRIPES' device mark is used by the Plaintiffs on shoes and various other sportswear, clothing, basketballs and other sporting equipments and the immediate recognition and association of the 'THREE STRIPES' mark is with the Plaintiffs. The 'THREE STRIPES' mark is also registered in several countries of the world as a device mark. It is also registered in India, in various forms, since 1989 in Class 25. The details of the said registrations is as under:-

"TRADE MARK REGISTRATIONS - INDIA

11. In order to accord statutory protection to the THREE STRIPES device mark in India, the Plaintiff No. 1 also applied and has been granted trade mark registrations of the same as per the following details:

Sl. No.

Trade Mark Registration No. and Date

Class

Goods

Depiction of Trade Mark

Renewal Status

1.

932041

 

14.06.2000

25

Footwear, Sports Shoes, Shoes For Casual Wear, All Being Goods Falling In Class 25

xxx

Renewed and valid till 14.06.2020

2.

511874

 

14.06.1989

25

Sports and Leisure Shoes, Sports And Leisure Garments

xxx

Renewed and valid till 14.06.2020

3.

2983183

 

10/06/2015

25

Footwear

xxx

Renewed and valid till 10.06.2025

4. The Plaintiffs have placed on record documents showing various promotional activities and endorsements by well-known personalities such as leading athletes, sportsmen and sportswomen worldwide, including in India, who have been engaged for promotion of footwear bearing the 'THREE STRIPES' device mark in television commercials, print media advertisements, hoardings, magazine covers, online video platforms etc. Such sports personalities include, Mr. Sachin Tendulkar, Mr. Virat Kohli, Mr. Virendra Sehwag, Ms. Sania Mirza, Mr. Chris Gayle, Ms. Hima Das, etc.

5. The images of these personalities who have promoted the product of the Plaintiffs are also extracted in the plaint and filed with the documents. The Plaintiffs have also promoted the ADIDAS product with the 'THREE STRIPES' device mark in various feature films. The sales and advertisement figures also, provided in the plaint, show that the 'THREE STRIPES' device mark is very well-known and enjoys a formidable reputation.

IMAGE

6. The Plaintiffs came to know in September, 2018 that the Defendants are using the trademark COLO however with the 'THREE STRIPES' device mark on their footwear. Accordingly, the present suit was filed against Defendants 1-3. Defendant No.1, M/s Colo Footwear, was claimed to be the manufacturer and distributor of footwear. Defendant No.2 and 3 are the dealers of Defendant No.1. The images of the infringing shoes have been extracted in para 23 of the plaint which are as under:

7. On 5th September, 2018 this Court had granted an ad-interim injunction in the following terms:

"10. The Court has perused the plaint a


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top