SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Del) 811

S.MURALIDHAR, SANJEEV NARULA
Prem Chand Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Railway Protection Force – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Rakesh Mittal, Adv., Pradeep Gupta, Adv., Parinav Gupta, Adv., Mansi Gupta, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

S. MURALIDHAR, J.

1. 55 Petitioners who applied pursuant to an Employment Notice issued by the Railway Board for the post of Constable (Water Carrier) etc. in the Railway Protection Force ("RPF") including the Railway Protection Special Force ("RPSF") in seven different categories including Water Carrier, Safaiwala, Washerman, Barber, Mali, Tailor and Cobbler have filed the present petition for directions to the Respondents to appoint them to the vacancies in the above posts.

2. The background facts are that Employment Notice No. 1/2013 dated 6th December, 2013 was issued by the Railway Board inviting applications for the aforementioned post of Constables. The number of vacancies to be filled up was 659. There were 406 vacancies in the post of Constable (Water Carrier), 117 for Constable (Safaiwala), 53 for Constable (Washerman), 61 for Constable (Barber), 7 for Constable (Mali), 9 for Constable (Tailor) and 6 for Constable (Cobbler). Subsequently, the above 659 vacancies were revised to 763 vacancies across the board for all categories.

3. The notes in the notice read a

























































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top