SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Del) 821

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
S. MURALIDHAR, I.S. MEHTA, JJ.
Harinder Singh and Others - Appellant
Versus
LT Governor and Another - Respondent
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 9698 of 2017; Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 39496 of 2017, 46868 of 2018
Decided on : 29-03-2019

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Sachin Nawani, Adv., Ajay Verma, Adv., Sapna Chauhan, Adv., Sumit Mishra, Adv., Leeza Taneja, Adv., Swati Yadav, Adv.

The court clarified that Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act cannot be invoked to revive stale or dead claims and that the provision is not intended to aid those who refuse compensation and engage in prolonged litigation.

Headnote:

Land Acquisition - Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 - Section 24(2) - LAA, 1894 - Section 4, Section 6, Section 17(1), Section 9, Section 10 - Pune Municipal Corporation v. Harakchand Misirimal Solanki, (2014) 3 SCC 183 - Indore Development Authority v. Shailendra, (2018) 3 SCC 412

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners sought a writ to quash an award and restore the title of their land, claiming it was not part of the acquisition scheme. The respondents contended that the petition was time-barred and the land was acquired for a public purpose.

Finding of the Court:

The court dismissed the petition, finding that the petitioners had received compensation and enhanced compensation, and their claim of continued possession was disputed. The court also rejected the plea for alternative land and a declaration under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.

Issues: Delay in filing the petition, possession of the land, entitlement to alternative land, and the applicability of Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The petitioners' receipt of compensation and enhanced compensation, along with the disputed claim of continued possession, led to the dismissal of the petition. The court also held that Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act could not be invoked by the petitioners.

Final Decision: The petition was dismissed, and the applications were also dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

S. MURALIDHAR, J.

1. The prayers in the present writ petition read as under:

"It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue appropriate Writ Order or direction, more specifically in the nature of Certiorari to quash the. award 26/2002-2003 dated 23.10.2002 in respect of the land of Petitioner No. 1 measuring 2 acre, in Khasra No. 30/16, 17, 24/1, 25, 29, 31/20, 21/1, further in respect of land of Petitioner No. 2, 3 and 4 measuring 1 acre forming part of Khasra No. 19/16/2, 17/2, 24/2, 25/2, 234/1, further in respect of Petitioner No. 5 had expired and his LRs having land measuring 6 acres, forming part of Khasra No. 10/3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 13, 14, 15/2, 17/1, 18, 27/16, 25, 44/4/2, 5, 6/2 further in respect of Petitioner No. 6 measuring 1 acre and 13 biswas of land, forming part of Khasra No. 19/17/3, 23/2, 24/1, 234/1, further in respect of Petitioner no. 7, 8 and 9 jointly having land measuring 3 acre and 3 bigha of land, forming part of Khasra No. 9/24, 25/1, 21/10/2, 11, 20, 28, 22/4, 5, 6, 7, 14/1, 15, 16, 29, 171, 172, 479 being in cultivatory possession, even after acquisition. It is further prayed for issuance of a writ of mandamus thereby directing the respondents to restore the title of the respective land, in favour of the petitioners, since the land mentioned hereinabove was not a part of the scheme, at the time of the acquisition, of the land of the petitioners, subject to the petitioners returning the amount of compensation, enhanced compensation and the interest thereon."

2. On 3rd November 2017 while directing notice to issue in the present petition, the following order was passed:

"This is a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioners. It is claimed by the petitioners that despite a Section 4 Notification of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 having been issued on 13.12.2000, Section 6 Notification of the Act having been issued on 15.03.2002 and an Award having been made on 23.10.2002, the possession of the land in question of the petitioners has not been taken nor compensation paid.

Notice to show cause as to why the petition be not admitted. Counsels appearing for the respondents accept notice. Notice in the stay application as well.

Counter affidavit to the petition and reply to the application be filed within six weeks. Rejoinder, if any. be filed within four weeks thereafter.

Counsel for the petitioners seek leave to file amended memo of parties as the Land and Building Department has not been arrayed as a party. Let amended memo of parties be filed. List on 29.01.2018."

3. Following the above order on 6th November 2017 an amended memo of parties was filed. In terms thereof, there are 9 Petitioners. The Land Acquisition Collector ("LAC") South West (SW) is Respondent No.1, the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) is Respondent No.2 and the Land and Building Department (L&B) is Respondent No.3.

4. A counter-affidavit was filed by the LAC (SW) on 9th April 2018 inter alia contending as under:

(i) The petition is liable to be dismissed on the ground of delay and laches; the Petitioners are invoking the writ jurisdiction and seeking a declaration in terms of Section 24 (2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 ("the 2013 Act") after lapse of more than 3 years of the coming into force of the 2013 Act.

(ii) The notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (LAA) was issued on 13th December 2000 for the public purpose for the Dwarka Phase-2 under Plan Development of Delhi. This was followed by declaration under Section 6 LAA issued on 7th December 2001. A notice under Section 17(1) of the LAA was issued on 15th March 2002. Notices under Sections 9 and 10 of the LAA issued inviting claims and such claims are also filed. Ultimately an Award No.26/2002-03 was passed by the LAC on 23rd October 2002. Possession of the land was taken over and handed over






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top