SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Del) 838

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.
Vijay Pal @ Sittu - Appellant
Versus
State - Respondent
Bail Application No. 698 of 2019
Decided on : 26-03-2019

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Siddharth Pandit, Adv., Aradhana Pandit, Adv., Kusum Dhalla, Adv.

The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's discretion to grant interim bail based on the verified medical condition of the family member, the progress of the trial, and the absence of misuse of previous interim bail.

Headnote:

Interim Bail - Surgery of Father - The petitioner sought interim bail for 45 days due to the planned surgery of his father, who suffered from heart ailments. The court granted interim bail for four weeks, subject to certain conditions.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought interim bail for 45 days due to the planned surgery of his father, who suffered from heart ailments. The petitioner's family consisted of only female members, his wife and mother, both suffering from ailments.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the medical condition of the petitioner's father had been verified, and the surgery was confirmed to be a planned procedure, not an emergency. The court noted that the petitioner had been granted interim bail previously for the treatment of his wife, mother, and father, and there was no indication of misuse of liberty. The court also considered the progress of the trial and the remaining witnesses.

Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner was entitled to interim bail for the surgery of his father, considering the medical conditions of the family members and the stage of the trial.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the totality of facts and circumstances, including the verified medical condition of the father, the progress of the trial, and the absence of misuse of previous interim bail. Based on these considerations, the court granted interim bail for four weeks, subject to specific conditions.

Final Decision: The petition was disposed of, and the petitioner was granted interim bail for four weeks, subject to conditions related to the admission and surgery of his father, and the petitioner's obligation to keep the Investigating Officer informed of the medical treatment of his father.

JUDGMENT :

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.

Petitioner seeks interim bail for a period of 45 days in FIR No.189/2014 under Sections 302/307/34 IPC read with Sections 25/25(54)/27/59 Arms Act, Police Station Mehrauli on the ground of surgery of the father of the petitioner.

2. It is contended that the petitioner is the only son and there are only female members in the family, i.e., the wife and the mother of the petitioner, both of whom are suffering from several ailments.

3. Status report has been filed. The same is taken on record.

4. The medical condition of the father of the petitioner has been verified. As per the status report, the ailment of the father of the petitioner has been confirmed. However, the doctor has stated that the surgery is a planned surgery and not an emergency procedure.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the father of the petitioner suffers from heart ailments also, the date of surgery has been proposed as 27.03.2019.

6. Perusal of the record shows that the petitioner has earlier been granted interim bail for treatment of his wife, mother and father. Status report does not indicate that the petitioner has misused the liberty at any point of time.

7. As per the record, all public witnesses have already been examined and only official/police witnesses are remaining to be examined. Out of 65 witnesses, only 13 witnesses have been examined so far.

8. Keeping in view the totality of facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that petitioner is entitled to interim bail for a period of four weeks.

9. Accordingly, on petitioner furnishing a bail bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, petitioner shall be released on interim bail for a period of four weeks from the date of his release.

10. Petitioner shall on admission of his father in the hospital for surgery, inform the Investigating Officer of the date, time and the name of hospital of admission of his father and the date of surgery. In case the father of the petitioner is not admitted in hospital or the surgery is not performed within one week of the release of the petitioner, the petitioner shall surrender to the Superintendent, Jail forthwith. In case the surgery is performed within a period of one week from the date of his release, petitioner shall surrender to the Superintendent, Jail within four weeks from the date of his release. Petitioner shall keep the Investigating Officer informed of the medical treatment of the father. Petitioner shall not do anything which may prejudice either the trial or the prosecution witnesses.

11. Petition is disposed of in the above terms.

12. Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master.


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top