SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Del) 848

VINOD GOEL
Sanjay Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Sudhir Malhotra – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
V.K. Garg, Adv., Bijender Singh, Adv., Noopur Dubey, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Vinog Goel, J.

The impugned order dated 30.01.2019 passed by the Court of learned Additional District Judge-04, South East District, Saket Court, New Delhi ('ADJ'), in Civil Suit No. 8018/2016 dismissing the application of the appellant/plaintiff No.1 and the Respondent No.4/Plaintiff No.2, under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 r/w Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is the subject matter of challenge in this appeal.

2. As per the factual matrix, the appellant and respondent no.4 jointly purchased an area of approximately 340 square feet, i.e, front portion of the basement of property No. A-249, Defence Colony, New Delhi vide registered Sale Deed dated 28.01.2003 from the respondent no.1. They claimed that the respondent nos. 1, 2 and 3 in collusion and connivance obtained a judgment and decree dated 21.10.2011 directing the appellant and the respondent no. 4 to deliver the possession of the property to the respondent no.3. It is also pleaded that the respondent no.3 has filed an execution of judgment and decree dated 21.10.2011 in which warrants of possession in respect of the said property have been issued.

3. It has been pleaded by the respondent no.3 in its wri
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top