Prathiba M. Singh, J.

I.As. 8640/2016 & 532/2019 (u/O XXII Rule 10 CPC), I.A. 8956/2016 (u/O XXII Rule 3(2) CPC) & I.A. 2893/2019 (u/o I Rule 10 CPC) in CS(COMM) 1031/2016

I.As. 8627/2016 & 549/2019 (u/O XXII Rule 10 CPC), I.A. 8958/2016 (u/O XXII Rule 3(2) CPC) & I.A. 2894/2019 (u/o I Rule 10 CPC) in CS(COMM) 1032/2016

1. The present suits relate to the trademarks “RATNA”, “RATNACHHAP”, “PRABHAT ZARDA”, “RATNA CHHAP ZAFRANI PATTI” “RAJRATAN” and the numeral “300” which were owned by Sh. Lalit Kumar Arya. Disputes have arisen amongst the various family members of Sh. Lalit Kumar Arya who was married to Smt. Rukmini Devi. They had three sons, namely, Sh. Vijay Kumar Arya, Sh. Jyoti Kumar Arya and Sh. Pradeep Kumar Arya. Sh. Vijay Kumar Arya pre-deceased Sh. Lalit Kumar Arya. His interest is being represented in the proceedings filed by his wife - Smt. Chaya Devi. Sh. Pradeep Kumar Arya also pre-deceased his father and he is represented through his son - Sh. Purushottam Kumar Arya. The litigation has had a chequered history in respect of the trademarks which are used by the various businesses. There were several entities which have been established during the lifetime of Sh. L