SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Del) 916

R.K.GAUBA
Satish Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Viresh B Saharya, Adv., K.S. Ahuja, Adv., Manoj Chaudhary, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

R.K.Gauba, J.

Amit Sharma, son of the petitioner, was married to Pooja Kaushik on 01.02.2013. The marriage having run into rough weather, Pooja Kaushik statedly left the matrimonial home on 11.01.2014. She eventually lodged first information report (FIR) no. 125/2014 dated 03.04.2013, with police station Pul Prahlad Pur, alleging offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/354/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), against the members of the matrimonial family, including the petitioner and his son Amit Sharma. In the wake of the said FIR, the petitioner had moved the Court of Sessions for anticipatory bail, his application having come up for consideration on 15.05.2014. He was granted protection against arrest, the matter having been adjourned to 04.06.2014, with some directions about recovery and return of stridhan articles.

2. It is alleged that pursuant to the said order on 15.05.2014 the second to fourth respondents herein, accompanied by the complainant of the said case, visited the house of the petitioner at about 5.00 p.m., at Flat no. 405, Charmwood Village, Surajkund, Faridabad and made certain seizures adopting a procedure which was wholly illegal and in violation o


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top