SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Del) 997

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
Sarabjit Singh Chadha – Appellant
Versus
Dinesh Sehgal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sonal Sarda, Adv., Inderbir Singh Alag, Adv., Sumit Ghelot, Adv., Anirudh Sharma, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J.

The question for adjudication is the maintainability of the suit under Order XXXVII of the CPC.

2. Though the Joint Registrar, on 29th November, 2018, treating the suit labeled as under Order XXXVII of the CPC, as one under Order XXXVII of the CPC, ordered summons for appearance to be issued and the defendant has entered appearance but when the plaintiff applied for issuance of summons for judgment, the Joint Registrar ordered the suit to be listed before the bench and the suit came up before this Court on 20th February, 2019 when the counsel for the plaintiff was unable to satisfy this Court of maintainability of the suit under Order XXXVII of the CPC and on his request, the suit was posted for hearing on the said aspect today subject to plaintiff paying costs of Rs.10,000/- to the defendant.

3. The counsel for the defendant states that costs have not been paid. The senior counsel for the plaintiff states that costs will be paid during the course of the day.

4. The senior counsel for the plaintiff has been heard.

5. The plaintiff has pleaded that, (i) the plaintiff agreed to enter into an agreement with the defendant to the effect "that the plaintiff wo

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top