HIMA KOHLI, MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Sunil Duggal – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Manoj Kumar Ohri, J.
Three appellants had jointly filed the present appeal against the impugned judgment dated 11.02.2004, passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Delhi in Sessions Case No.86/90, arising out of FIR No.82/89, registered at Police Station Nabi Karim, Delhi, convicting them for the murder of Sushma, sister-in-law of appellant no.1, daughter-in-law of appellant no.2 and wife of appellant no.3 punishable under Sections 302/34 IPC and Sections 498-A/34 IPC. As per the order on sentence dated 13.02.2004, the appellants were sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life with a fine of Rs. 15,000/- each and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo R.I. for six months under Section 302/34 IPC. The appellants were also sentenced to undergo R.I. for three years under Section 498-A/34 IPC with fine of Rs. 5,000/- each and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo R.I. for four months. The fourth accused, Subhash Duggal was acquitted of all the charges framed against him. The fifth accused Mahender Nath Duggal had expired during the trial. During the pendency of the present appeal, the appellant No.2, i.e., Asha Rani Duggal also expired on 17.01.2014
Chandra Bhawan Singh Vs. State of U.P.
Dhananjay Chatterjee @ Dhana Vs. State of West Bengal
Ganjan Dashrath Kharate Vs. State of Maharashtra
Kuldeep Singh and Ors Vs. State of Rajasthan
Manoj Kumar Sharma Vs. State of Chhatisgarh and Anr.
Pedda Narayana Vs. State of A.P.
Sunita Sharma and Ors Vs. State of Delhi
Suresh Rai and Ors Vs. State of Bihar
Tehseen Poonawalla Vs. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.