VIPIN SANGHI, J.

C.M. No. 10584/2019

1. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. For the reasons stated in the application and the explanation furnished, we waive of the costs imposed upon the petitioner vide our order dated 14.02.2019 both in the W.P. (C) No. 2220/2016 & W.P. (C) No. 10998/2016.

W.P. (C) 2220/2016

The petitioner has assailed the order dated 04.11.2015, passed by the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT), Delhi in Appeal No. 332/2015, arising out of O.A. No. 79/2005 (Delhi-I). By the impugned order the Appellate Tribunal has rejected the said appeal preferred by the petitioner bank.

2. The petitioner had preferred the said appeal to raise a challenge to the final order dated 19.08.2015 passed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) I, Delhi in O.A. No. 79/2005, titled State Bank of Patiala vs. GABS (Group Apparel Business Service) with two others. The same is referred to as the final order.

3. We may observe that the final order relates to two Original Applications preferred by the petitioner bank, the other being O.A. No. 59/2005. O.A. No. 59/2005 had been preferred in respect of a home loan granted by the petitioner bank to the defendants in the said