SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL
STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) – Appellant
Versus
KULDEEP @ SONU – Respondent
Sangita Dhingra Sehgal, J.
The present leave petition has been filed by the State under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as "Cr.P.C.") against the impugned judgment dated15.05.2018 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge01, New Delhi District, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi in Sessions Case No. 9210/2016 arising out of case FIR No. 585/2015 under Sections 377/342 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as 'IPC') and under Sections 4/8 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012(hereinafter referred to as 'POCSO Act') whereas, the charges were later modified to section 6/10 of the POCSO Act registered at Police Station - South Campus, New Delhi, whereby the respondent was acquitted of the offences punishable under Sections 377/342 of IPC and under sections 6/10of POCSO Act.
2. The brief facts of the case, as observed by the learned Trial Court are reproduced as under:-
"In the night of 08.10.2015, the complainant/mother of the victim/PW1 came to the police station along with her husband and the victim child. SI Pratap Singh/PW7 recorded the statement of the complainant/Ex.PW1/A. Along with Ct. Basram/PW4, th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.