Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.

Petitioner impugns judgment dated 13.03.2015 whereby the revisional court has set aside the order on charge dated 17.11.2014 whereby the charge was framed by the trial court against respondent no. 2 under Section 420/467/468/471 of the IPC and the respondent no. 2 was discharged.

2. Petitioner- Original Complainants have impugned the said order inter-alia on the ground that no notice under Section 401 Cr. P.C. was issued to them prior to the Revisional Court passing an order which was averse to their interests. Secondly the petitioner impugns the order contending that the order on charge was an order on correct appreciation of documents and other material and evidence and the statements of witnesses which were filed along with the charge sheet.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the revisional court, inter-alia, erred in not appreciating the fact that the documents which were submitted by respondent no. 2 for the purpose of mutation were ex-facie forged and the FSL report had clearly indicated that the same were not signed by the petitioners.

4. It is contended that respondent no. 2 had applied for mutation of the property left behind by t