SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Del) 1380

G.S.SISTANI, JYOTI SINGH
P. S. Rajput – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P. Sureshan, Adv., Amit Mahajan, Adv., Randeep Sachdeva, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Jyoti Singh, J.

The present petition has been filed seeking to set aside the office orders dated 02.03.2015 and letter dated 03.09.2015 whereby the respondents have denied the grant of 3rd MACP to the petitioner with effect from 02.01.2015 with a further direction to the respondents to grant him 3rd MACP with effect from 02.01.2015 with interest @18% per annum as well as arrears of pay and other consequential benefits.

2. The facts relevant to the present case are that the petitioner was appointed as a Constable (GD) with the CISF vide order dated 11/15.01.1985 w.e.f. 02.01.1985 in the pay scale 210-4-250-EB-5-270 After initial 6 months of training, he got his first regular posting on 08.07.1985 and was thereafter posted at various other Units of the CISF. Pursuant to direct recruitment taking place for the post of Head Constable (Driver), the petitioner also applied and was selected. He was finally appointed as Head Constable (Driver) on 02.09.1997 in a higher pay scale 975-25-1150-EB-1660.

3. The petitioner claims that no technical resignation was taken from him an



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top