SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

S.N.DHINGRA
Morgan Tectronics Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
CBI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Vijay Aggarwal
For the Respondent: Suchiti Chandra, for Vikas Pahwa

JUDGMENT :

Shiv Narayan Dhingra, J.

By the present petition, the petitioner has assailed an order dated 12th August, 2008 passed by learned Special Judge, CBI, whereby the learned Special Judge framed charges against the petitioner company charging the company u/s 420, 468, 471 IPC read with Section 120-B IPC. The only contention raised by the petitioner before this Court is that a company being a juristic person cannot have mens rea necessary for committing offence of criminal conspiracy as required u/s 120-B IPC. It was contended that criminal conspiracy was a personal act and company being a non living person and only a juristic person cannot have the requisite mens rea. Reliance was placed by the petitioner on Kalpnath Rai v. State AIR 1998 SC 201 and Standard Chartered Bank and Others etc. Vs. Directorate of Enforcement and Others etc. (2005) 4 SCC 530, and other similar cases.

2. This issue was raised before the Trial Court as well and the Trial Court has dealt with this issue at length. In the present case it would be relevant to note that initially the banker of this company was Indian Bank and this company was enjoying various facilities and limits there. The Indian Bank refu









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top