SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

V.P.VAISH
MCD General Mazdoor Union – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Varun Prasad.
For the Respondent:Akash Vajpai, Advocates.

JUDGMENT :

V.P. Vaish, J.

1. By this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner impugns order bearing F. No. L-42011-/113/2012-IR(DU) dated 09.04.2014 passed by Section Officer, Ministry of Labour and Employment, Government of India whereby it was observed that the matter raised by the Union cannot be considered for adjudication. Mr. Akash Vajpai, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondent and submits that he does not want to file reply/counter affidavit.

2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is taken up for final disposal.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner urges that on 21.11.2011 the petitioner made a representation to the MCD requesting for merger of supervisory post i.e. Sr. Field Worker with Assistant Malaria Inspector w.e.f. 01.01.1996. Thereafter, the petitioner filed statement of claim before the Regional Labour Commissioner (Central), New Delhi which culminated into impugned order dated 09.04.2014 whereby it was decided that the matter raised by the Union cannot be considered for adjudication.

4. The only grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner had approached the respondent for making a refere







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top