SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Del) 2530

MUKTA GUPTA
Asha Narang Spaak – Appellant
Versus
Hafco Brass USA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Ravi Sikri, Mr. P.K. Sharma, Mr. Sagari Dhanda, Advs. for Plaintiff.
Mr. J.C. Mahindro, Adv. with defendant No. 2 in person.

Mukta Gupta, J.

1. The plaintiffs have filed the present suit, inter alia, praying for a decree of possession of ground floor of A-27, Nizamuddin West, New Delhi with mesne profit with effect from 1st January, 2012 till the actual physical possession of the premises is delivered along with the costs.

2. By way of present application the plaintiffs pray for passing of a preliminary decree of possession of the demised premises consisting of one dining room, three bed rooms with attached bath rooms, a kitchen, a servant quarter and front lawn from the defendants on the basis of admissions made by the defendants under Order XII Rule 6 CPC.

3. Learned counsel for the plaintiffs contends that the defendants in the written statement have admitted that the premises was given on rent, the suit for recovery of possession is not protected under the provisions of Rent Control Act and the landlord tenant relationship having been severed by notice served by the plaintiffs under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act (in short the T.P. Act), the plaintiffs are entitled to a judgment and decree for possession. The pleas of the defendant even if accepted do not affect the entitlement of the plain

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top